Where will a stand-alone table in a geodatabase reside if it contains additional information about land parcels?

A stand-alone table in a geodatabase that contains additional information about land parcels is best placed within the same feature dataset as the parcel feature class. This placement encourages effective data management and relationships between the spatial data (such as features representing the land parcels) and the tabular data holding additional information.

When the stand-alone table is stored in the same feature dataset, it allows for easier association and integration of the data. This means that the attributes in the table can be linked directly to the spatial features through relationships or joins. It enhances usability by keeping all related data together within a logical structure, ensuring that the data model accurately represents the real-world scenario of land parcels and their associated information.

Other options may suggest various incorrect placements. For instance, storing the table at the root level could lead to organizational challenges and difficulties in maintaining relationships with related spatial data. Similarly, creating a new feature dataset or network dataset specifically for a stand-alone table would be unnecessary and complicate the data model when there’s a direct correlation with the existing feature class. Thus, the most logical and efficient choice is to house the stand-alone table within the same feature dataset as the parcel feature class.